[PATCH 09/13] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 - 8:36 am

Redirtied inodes could be seen in really fast writes.
They should really be synced as soon as possible.

redirty_tail() could delay the inode for up to 30s.
Kill the delay by using requeue_io() instead.

Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-mm.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ linux-mm/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
 			 * Someone redirtied the inode while were writing back
 			 * the pages.
 			 */
-			redirty_tail(inode);
+			requeue_io(inode);
 		} else if (atomic_read(&inode->i_count)) {
 			/*
 			 * The inode is clean, inuse

-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 09/13] writeback: requeue_io() on redirtied inode, Fengguang Wu, (Tue Jan 15, 8:36 am)