Re: [patch 5/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged bind mounts

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <hch@...>, <serue@...>, <viro@...>, <ebiederm@...>, <kzak@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <containers@...>, <util-linux-ng@...>
Date: Thursday, January 10, 2008 - 12:47 am

Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos@szeredi.hu):

That little part by itself is really needed in order to make the ability
to remove CAP_MKNOD from a process tree's bounding set meaningful.
Else instead of creating /dev/hda1, the user can just mount a filesystem
with hda1 existing on it.  (Which is why I was surprised when one day
I found this code missing :)

But of course I'm a fan of the patchset altogether.  I plan to review in
more detail early next week, but since I liked the previous submission I
don't see myself having any complaints, so I'm glad to see the reviews
by others.

thanks,
-serge

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 5/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged bind..., Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Jan 10, 12:47 am)
Re: [patch 5/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged bind..., Szabolcs Szakacsits, (Tue Jan 8, 4:44 pm)