login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [patch 0/2] i_version update

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jean noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...>
Cc: <linux-ext4@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <nfsv4@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 - 8:21 pm

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:25:31PM +0200, Jean noel Cordenner wrote:

My understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) is that the
requirements are much more rigourous than simply incrementing an in
memory counter on every change.  i.e. the this counter has to
survive server crashes intact so clients never see the counter go
backwards. That means version number changes need to be journalled
along with the operation that caused the change of the version
number.

                ^^^^

File data writes are included in this list of things that need to
increment the version field. Hence to fulfill the crash requirement,
that implies server data writes either need to be synchronous or
journalled...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 0/2] i_version update, Jean noel Cordenner, (Fri May 25, 12:25 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] i_version update, David Chinner, (Tue May 29, 8:21 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] i_version update, Mingming Cao, (Wed May 30, 7:32 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] i_version update, David Chinner, (Wed May 30, 8:33 pm)
Re: [patch 0/2] i_version update, Mingming Cao, (Thu May 31, 2:12 pm)
speck-geostationary