> When the real superblock is created. It could even be the _same_Then I do not understand what this mechanism could be used for, other than an odd way to twist POSIX behaviour and see how much of the userland would survive that. Certainly not useful for your "look into tarball as a tree", unless you seriously want to scan the entire damn fs for tarballs at mount time and set up a superblock for each. And for per-file extended attributes/forks/whatever-you-call-that-abomination it also obviously doesn't help, since you lose them for directories. IOW, what uses do you have in mind? Complete scenario, please... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Mariusz Kozlowski | [PATCH 01] kmalloc + memset conversion co kzalloc |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10629] 2.6.26-rc1-$sha1: RIP __d_lookup+0x8c/0x160 |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
