login
Header Space

 
 

Re: forced umount?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, March 26, 2007 - 5:34 pm

Is this revoke system supported for the filesystem as a whole?  I 
thought it was just to force specific files closed, not the whole 
filesystem.  What if the filesystem itself has pending IO to say, update 
inodes or block bitmaps?  Can these be aborted?

Pekka Enberg wrote:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sat Mar 17, 12:06 am)
Re: forced umount?, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Mar 18, 3:16 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Pozsar Balazs, (Mon Mar 26, 7:21 am)
Re: forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sun Mar 18, 4:20 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun Mar 18, 4:13 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Mar 18, 7:45 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 1:24 am)
Re: forced umount?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Mar 17, 12:27 am)
Re: forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sat Mar 17, 1:37 am)
Re: forced umount?, Pekka Enberg, (Sat Mar 17, 6:53 am)
Re: forced umount?, Phillip Susi, (Mon Mar 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Pekka J Enberg, (Tue Mar 27, 2:32 am)
Re: forced umount?, Phillip Susi, (Wed Mar 28, 10:46 am)
speck-geostationary