login
Header Space

 
 

Re: forced umount?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 3:16 pm

On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:06 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:


the problem with the people who say they want forced umount is.. that
most of the time they either want
1) get rid of the namespace entry
or
2) want to stop any and all IO to a certain device/partition 

1) is already supported with lazy umount (umount -l)
for 2), it's not forced umount that they want, it's really an IO
disconnect (which scsi supports btw in 2.6 kernels).

So.. depending on which of the 2 you are, it's there. Just it's not
called "forced umount".....


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sat Mar 17, 12:06 am)
Re: forced umount?, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Mar 18, 3:16 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Pozsar Balazs, (Mon Mar 26, 7:21 am)
Re: forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sun Mar 18, 4:20 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Matthew Wilcox, (Sun Mar 18, 4:13 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Jan Engelhardt, (Sun Mar 18, 7:45 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Gene Heskett, (Sat Mar 17, 1:24 am)
Re: forced umount?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sat Mar 17, 12:27 am)
Re: forced umount?, Mike Snitzer, (Sat Mar 17, 1:37 am)
Re: forced umount?, Pekka Enberg, (Sat Mar 17, 6:53 am)
Re: forced umount?, Phillip Susi, (Mon Mar 26, 5:34 pm)
Re: forced umount?, Pekka J Enberg, (Tue Mar 27, 2:32 am)
Re: forced umount?, Phillip Susi, (Wed Mar 28, 10:46 am)
speck-geostationary