On Mon, 5 November 2007 13:01:25 -0800, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:Frowned-upon-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org> This patch changes some 400 lines, most if not all of which get longer and more complicated to read. 23 get sufficiently longer to require an additional linebreak. I can't remember complexity being invited into the kernel without good reasoning, yet the patch description is surprisingly low on reasoning: The following two patches manage to remove 7 lines in total. In total 23 were added, 7 removed , 400+ made longer and more complicated. Is there another more favorable metric? Will this patchset prevent bugs? Shrink the kernel size? Anything? If churn is the only effect of this, please considere it NAKed again. Jörn -- A surrounded army must be given a way out. -- Sun Tzu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Christos Zoulas | Re: Boot device confusion |
| Manuel Bouyer | Re: NFSv3 bug |
| Anders Magnusson | Re: setsockopt() compat issue |
| Martin Husemann | Re: Compressed vnd handling tested successfully |
