On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:47:27 +0900 Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

quoted text
> Currently fdatasync is identical to fsync in ext3,4.
> I think fdatasync should skip journal flush in data=ordered and data=writeback mode
> because this syscall is not required to synchronize the metadata.

I suppose so.  Although one wonders what earthly point there is in syncing
a file's data if we haven't yet written out the metadata which is required
for locating that data.

IOW, fdatasync() is only useful if the application knows that it is overwriting
already-instantiated blocks.

In which case it might as well have used fsync().  For ext2-style filesystems,
anyway.

hm.  It needs some thought.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html