On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:15:41PM +0000, David Howells wrote:Yes. No it's easy. It's PAGE_SIZE (which also happens to be PAGE_CACHE_SIZE). An implementation that would (not trivially, but without changing the basic concepts) allow a larger pagecache size is with compound pages. And actually hugetlbfs already does this. And it can also represent a PAGE_CACHE_SIZE page of pagecache. I'm not talking about a specific implementation that allows PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE. So no, I don't say anything about that. I say that pagecache pages are PAGE_CACHE_SIZE! Yes it is easy now because that is the same as PAGE_SIZE. Yes it will be harder if you wanted to change that. What you would not have to change is the assumption that pagecache pages are in PAGE_SIZE units. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2 v2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
