> The next point then, I'd expect your fuse_page_mkwrite() to pushYou're talking about this: + wait_event(fc->writeback_waitq, + fc->numwrite < FUSE_WRITEBACK_THRESHOLD); right? It's one of the things I need to clean out, there's no point in fc->numwrite, which is essentially the same as the BDI_WRITEBACK counter. OTOH, I'm thinking about adding a per-fs limit (adjustable for privileged mounts) of dirty+writeback. I'm not sure how hard would it be to add support for this into balance_dirty_pages(). So I'm thinking of a parameter in struct backing_dev_info that is used to clip the calculated per-bdi threshold below this maximum. How would that affect the proportions algorithm? What would happen to the unused portion? Would it adapt to the slowed writeback and allocate it to some other writer? Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
