Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>
Cc: <dhowells@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 - 11:59 am

Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:


Where, please? mm kernels?


That depends on what the coverage of struct page is.  I don't actually know
whether this is PAGE_SIZE or PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; I assumed it to be the former,
but from what you've said, I'm not actually sure.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, David Howells, (Wed Nov 14, 9:56 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, Jörn, (Thu Nov 15, 1:09 pm)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, Nick Piggin, (Wed Nov 14, 11:23 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, David Howells, (Wed Nov 14, 11:59 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, Nick Piggin, (Wed Nov 14, 5:35 pm)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, David Howells, (Thu Nov 15, 8:05 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, Benny Halevy, (Thu Nov 15, 10:15 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, David Howells, (Thu Nov 15, 10:46 am)
Re: Should PAGE_CACHE_SIZE be discarded?, Nick Piggin, (Thu Nov 15, 5:30 pm)