Re: [RFC 0/2] readdir() as an inode operation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Kara <jack@...>
Cc: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Alexander Viro <viro@...>, Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 11:43 pm

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:

The hfsplus code keeps some extra data in the ->private_data of directories,
although I've lost track of the exact benefit from not looking at the code
in some years. As I recall it was a performance enhancement due to the
fact that the data for all directories is effectively in a single file.
I believe it was easier to keep the current position as a structure
rather than just an offset and be careful about the tracking. The hfs
code is almost identical to the hfsplus code in this area.

	Brad Boyer
	flar@allandria.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC 0/2] readdir() as an inode operation, Jan Blunck, (Sat Oct 20, 6:09 am)
Re: [RFC 0/2] readdir() as an inode operation, Jan Kara, (Tue Oct 30, 11:26 am)
Re: [RFC 0/2] readdir() as an inode operation, Theodore Tso, (Wed Oct 31, 3:13 am)
Re: [RFC 0/2] readdir() as an inode operation, Brad Boyer, (Tue Oct 30, 11:43 pm)