On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:26:04PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:The hfsplus code keeps some extra data in the ->private_data of directories, although I've lost track of the exact benefit from not looking at the code in some years. As I recall it was a performance enhancement due to the fact that the data for all directories is effectively in a single file. I believe it was easier to keep the current position as a structure rather than just an offset and be careful about the tracking. The hfs code is almost identical to the hfsplus code in this area. Brad Boyer flar@allandria.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
git: | |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
