On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Erez Zadok wrote:Why do you want to do that? You gave a good reason why it's easier for ecryptfs, but I doubt it's robust. The higher the level you choose to use, the harder to guarantee it won't deadlock. Or that's my gut feeling anyway. It's several years since I've thought about such issues: just because I came into this knowing about shmem_writepage, is perhaps not a good reason to choose me as advisor! Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
