Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <tytso@...>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 6:38 am

Hello.

I'm using ext3.
I'm running it on kernel 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 (CentOS 5) for x86_64.
I don't know whether some of the delayed allocation patches are used
for 2.6.18-8.1.14.el5 kernel.

I'm using VMware Workstation 6.0.0 build 45731 for x86_64.
It seems that there were some background tasks that delays writing.
I tried the following sequence, "sync" didn't affect.

[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# service vmware stop
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# sleep 30
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9280 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# sync
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9280 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# service vmware start
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# vmware
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# service vmware stop
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# sleep 30
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9748 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# sync
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9748 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# service vmware start
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# vmware
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# service vmware stop
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9749 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# sync
[root@sakura Ubuntu7.10]# filefrag Ubuntu7.10.vmem
Ubuntu7.10.vmem: 9755 extents found, perfection would be 5 extents

Thank you.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Oct 19, 11:39 pm)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Oct 23, 6:38 am)