Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2007 - 9:02 am

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:58:11PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

What filesystem are you using?  ext3?  ext4?  xfs?  And are you using
any non-standard patches, such as some of the delayed allocation
patches that have been floating around?  If you're using ext3, that
shouldn't be happening.....

If you use the -v option to filefrag, both before and after the sync,
that might show us what is going on.  The other thing is to use
debugfs and its "stat" command to get detailed breakdown of the block
assignments of the file.

Are you sure the file isn't getting written by some background tasks
that you weren't aware of?  This seems very strange; what
virtualization software are you using?  VMware, Xen, KVM?

	       		    			     - Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Oct 19, 11:39 pm)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Theodore Tso, (Mon Oct 22, 9:02 am)