Home » Mailing list archives » linux-fsdevel » 2007 » October » 19

Does \"32.1% non-contigunous\" mean severely fragmented?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...>
To: <linux-fsdevel@...>
Subject: Does \"32.1% non-contigunous\" mean severely fragmented?
Date: Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 9:49 pm

Hello.

I ran e2fsck and it reported as follows.

[root@sakura ~]# e2fsck -f /dev/hda1
e2fsck 1.39 (29-May-2006)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
/data/VMware: 349/19546112 files (32.1% non-contiguous), 31019203/39072080 blocks

Does non-contiguous mean fragmented?
If so, where is ext3defrag?

Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Does \"32.1% non-contigunous\" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Thu Oct 18, 9:49 pm)
Re: Does \"32.1% non-contigunous\" mean severely fragmented?, Theodore Tso, (Fri Oct 19, 2:52 pm)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Oct 19, 11:39 pm)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Theodore Tso, (Sat Oct 20, 9:17 am)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Mon Oct 22, 7:58 am)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Theodore Tso, (Mon Oct 22, 9:02 am)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Oct 23, 6:38 am)
Re: Does "32.1% non-contiguous" mean severely fragmented?, Theodore Tso, (Tue Oct 23, 8:34 am)