On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 08:22:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:Apples to oranges, Chris ;) btrfs linearises writes due to it's COW behaviour and this is trades off read speed. i.e. we take more seeks to read data so we can keep the write speed high. By using large blocks, you're reducing the number of seeks needed to find anything, and hence the read speed will increase. Write speed will be pretty much unchanged because btrfs does linear writes no matter the block size. XFS doesn't linearise writes and optimises it's layout for a large number of disks and a low number of seeks on reads - the opposite of btrfs. Hence large block sizes reduce the number of writes XFS needs to write a given set of data+metadata and hence write speed increases much more than the read speed (until you get to large tree traversals). The basic conclusion is that different filesystems will benefit in different ways with large block sizes.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Kamalesh Babulal | [BUILD-FAILURE] 2.6.26-rc8-mm1 - build failure at drivers/char/hvc_rtas.c |
| Luciano Rocha | usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
git: | |
