[GIT] locks.c updates for 2.6.24

Previous thread: Re: XFS regression? by David Chinner on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 7:57 am. (1 message)

Next thread: More Large blocksize benchmarks by Chris Mason on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 8:22 pm. (4 messages)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, Trond Myklebust <trond@...>
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 6:53 pm

You can pull the following file-locking changes from:

git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git locks

Cleanup, minor bugfixes and some documentation patches. They've been in
-mm for a while.

(By the way, I've also started some very primitive lease and flock
tests, available from:

git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/lock-tests.git

and I'm mainly depending on those and connectathon locking tests for
now.)

--b.

J. Bruce Fields (7):
locks: reverse order of posix_locks_conflict() arguments
locks: kill redundant local variable
locks: fix flock_lock_file() comment
Documentation: move mandatory locking documentation to filesystems/
locks: add warning about mandatory locking races
Documentation: move locks.txt in filesystems/
nfsd: remove IS_ISMNDLCK macro

Matthias Kaehlcke (1):
fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()

Pavel Emelyanov (9):
Memory shortage can result in inconsistent flocks state
Use list_first_entry in locks_wake_up_blocks
locks: Fix potential OOPS in generic_setlease()
Cleanup macros for distinguishing mandatory locks
GFS2: clean up explicit check for mandatory locks
9PFS: clean up explicit check for mandatory locks
AFS: clean up explicit check for mandatory locks
NFS: clean up explicit check for mandatory locks
Rework /proc/locks via seq_files and seq_list helpers

Documentation/00-INDEX | 6 +-
Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 4 +
Documentation/{ => filesystems}/locks.txt | 10 +-
.../mandatory-locking.txt} | 21 ++-
fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
fs/afs/flock.c | 3 +-
fs/gfs2/ops_file.c | 4 +-
fs/locks.c | 192 +++++++++-----------
fs/nfs/file.c | 3 ...

Previous thread: Re: XFS regression? by David Chinner on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 7:57 am. (1 message)

Next thread: More Large blocksize benchmarks by Chris Mason on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 8:22 pm. (4 messages)