Re: XFS regression?

Previous thread: Re: XFS regression? by David Chinner on Sunday, October 14, 2007 - 4:09 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: [GIT] locks.c updates for 2.6.24 by J. Bruce Fields on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 3:53 pm. (1 message)
From: David Chinner
Date: Monday, October 15, 2007 - 4:57 am

Because the inode has been modified, and instead of sprinkling
mark_inode_dirty_sync() all over the code, we can do it in a single
spot that catches all inode modifications. We don't have to think about

Sure, but there's plenty of other transactions that don't have such
a convenient hook.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-

Previous thread: Re: XFS regression? by David Chinner on Sunday, October 14, 2007 - 4:09 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: [GIT] locks.c updates for 2.6.24 by J. Bruce Fields on Monday, October 15, 2007 - 3:53 pm. (1 message)