On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:39:27 -0400 Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:I don't think it's a bug. Sure, O_DIRECT is synchronous, but that's because it is, err, direct. Not because it provides extra data-integrity guarantees. If you want those guarantees, use O_SYNC as well. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2 v2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
