Re: Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Friday, October 12, 2007 - 2:02 pm

On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:39:27 -0400
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:


I don't think it's a bug.  Sure, O_DIRECT is synchronous, but that's
because it is, err, direct.  Not because it provides extra data-integrity
guarantees.  If you want those guarantees, use O_SYNC as well.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes, Chris Mason, (Fri Oct 12, 1:39 pm)
Re: Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes, Andrew Morton, (Fri Oct 12, 2:02 pm)
Re: Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes, Florian Weimer, (Sat Oct 13, 4:24 am)
Re: Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes, Chuck Lever, (Mon Oct 15, 8:36 am)
Re: Correct behavior on O_DIRECT sparse file writes, Bryan Henderson, (Mon Oct 15, 9:53 am)