On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:20:19 -0400
Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:

quoted text
> According to vfs.txt, ->writepage() may return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE back
> to the VFS/VM.  Indeed some filesystems such as tmpfs can return
> AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE; and stackable file systems (e.g., Unionfs) also
> return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE if the lower f/s returned it.
> 
> Anyway, some Ubuntu users of Unionfs reported that msync(2) sometimes
> returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (decimal 524288) back to userland.
> Therefore, some user programs fail, esp. if they're written such as this:
> 
>      err = msync(...);
>      if (err != 0)
> 	// fail
> 
> They temporarily fixed the specific program in question (apt-get) to check
> 
>      if (err < 0)
> 	// fail
> 
> Is this a bug indeed, or are user programs supposed to handle
> AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (I hope not the latter).  If it's a kernel bug, what
> should the kernel return: a zero, or an -errno (and which one)?
> 

shit.  That's a nasty bug.  Really userspace should be testing for -1, but
the msync() library function should only ever return 0 or -1.

Does this fix it?

--- a/mm/page-writeback.c~a
+++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -850,8 +850,10 @@ retry:
 
 			ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);
 
-			if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE))
+			if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE)) {
 				unlock_page(page);
+				ret = 0;
+			}
 			if (ret || (--(wbc->nr_to_write) <= 0))
 				done = 1;
 			if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html