Re: [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Layton
Date: Sunday, December 3, 2006 - 5:49 am

Brad Boyer wrote:

Yes, most filesystems have their own scheme for managing i_ino 
assignment, so this is primarily for "pseudo-filesystems". Stuff like 
pipefs, sockfs, /proc, etc...


I have no problem with someone writing, selling and supporting 
proprietary modules. Knock yourself out. I just don't see a reason why I 
should contribute code to such an effort.

Still though, this was coded in part on company time. I certainly don't 
want to go against Red Hat's policy in such a matter, so I'll do some 
due diligence internally as to how this should be done.

In the meantime, does anyone have objections or comments on this 
approach on technical grounds?

Thanks,
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems wi ..., Jeff Layton, (Sun Dec 3, 5:49 am)