Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4

view
thread

Score:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Spam <spam@...>, <wichert@...>, <jra@...>, <torvalds@...>, <reiser@...>, <hch@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <flx@...>, <reiserfs-list@...>

Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4

Date: Thursday, August 26, 2004 - 10:07 am

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Lokier wrote:

quoted text> Properly implemented metadata can:
[snip world peace]
quoted text> all at once.  That includes program copies.

Show me the design for such a properly implemented thing.

None of the designs I've seen proposed so far are able
to do what you claim.

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Aug 24, 4:25 pm)

file-as-dir vs. dir? (was Re: silent semantic changes with r..., Andy Lutomirski, (Tue Sep 14, 12:27 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Wed Aug 25, 3:53 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Chris Friesen, (Wed Aug 25, 4:23 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jeremy Allison, (Wed Aug 25, 4:20 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 4:42 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Rik van Riel, (Thu Aug 26, 9:27 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 7:53 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Markus , (Thu Aug 26, 9:56 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Paul Jackson, (Thu Aug 26, 3:58 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 25, 4:08 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Aug 25, 4:22 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Mikulas Patocka, (Wed Aug 25, 8:18 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Aug 25, 8:27 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Mikulas Patocka, (Wed Aug 25, 8:51 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 4:36 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 6:53 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Aug 26, 6:59 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Spam, (Thu Aug 26, 7:17 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 7:07 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Rik van Riel, (Wed Aug 25, 8:57 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 4:40 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Lars Marowsky-Bree, (Thu Aug 26, 10:46 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Helge Hafting, (Thu Aug 26, 3:51 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Paul Jackson, (Thu Aug 26, 5:21 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Helge Hafting, (Fri Aug 27, 8:33 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 6:47 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Paul Jackson, (Thu Aug 26, 7:19 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Paul Jackson, (Thu Aug 26, 5:44 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 4:43 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Wed Aug 25, 4:41 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Rik van Riel, (Wed Aug 25, 5:03 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 5:00 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Markus T, (Wed Aug 25, 4:58 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Chris Mason, (Wed Aug 25, 4:51 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Michael Halcrow, (Thu Aug 26, 9:53 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 6:26 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Matt Mackall, (Wed Aug 25, 5:52 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Aug 25, 6:21 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 25, 4:35 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, , (Wed Aug 25, 4:42 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Aug 25, 5:00 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, , (Wed Aug 25, 5:25 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Aug 25, 8:11 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, , (Wed Aug 25, 8:30 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Aug 25, 9:00 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 4:49 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Joel Becker, (Thu Aug 26, 2:35 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Markus T, (Fri Aug 27, 5:19 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Aug 27, 8:26 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 3:53 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Aug 26, 10:05 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 11:02 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Horst von Brand, (Sat Aug 28, 7:14 pm)

The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was: si..., Jamie Lokier, (Wed Sep 1, 4:08 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Horst von Brand, (Thu Sep 2, 10:06 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Jamie Lokier, (Thu Sep 2, 1:32 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Christer Weinigel, (Thu Sep 2, 2:23 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Jamie Lokier, (Thu Sep 2, 5:47 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Christer Weinigel, (Mon Sep 6, 11:55 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Chris Dukes, (Mon Sep 6, 11:56 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 6:27 pm)

Re: Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives ..., Jon Smirl, (Fri Sep 3, 11:17 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Sep 1, 4:50 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Sun Sep 5, 9:16 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Pavel Machek, (Fri Sep 3, 11:44 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 5:46 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 4:38 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 3:56 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Mon Sep 6, 4:08 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Herbert Poetzl, (Mon Sep 6, 8:43 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Mon Sep 6, 8:54 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 7:19 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Jan Harkes, (Fri Sep 3, 3:13 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Fri Sep 3, 3:30 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 7:43 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 10:43 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Mon Sep 6, 10:59 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 7:52 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 7:41 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Dave Kleikamp, (Thu Sep 2, 5:36 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 5:48 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Clemens Schwaighofer, (Mon Sep 6, 8:53 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 9:45 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Mon Sep 6, 8:57 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Clemens Schwaighofer, (Mon Sep 6, 8:59 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Frank van Maarseveen, (Mon Sep 6, 9:01 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Clemens Schwaighofer, (Mon Sep 6, 9:17 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Mon Sep 6, 9:03 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 6:00 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:08 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, John Stoffel, (Fri Sep 3, 9:55 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Fri Sep 3, 10:01 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 4:58 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 3, 2:16 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 8:44 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:28 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Chris Dukes, (Thu Sep 2, 11:44 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Fri Sep 3, 12:37 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 3, 9:09 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, , (Thu Sep 2, 8:39 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 8:18 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 3, 1:22 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:25 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 6:02 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 6:06 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 6:11 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 6:17 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 6:26 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 4:04 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Mon Sep 6, 4:41 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 6:33 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Thu Sep 2, 6:56 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Helge Hafting, (Fri Sep 3, 4:43 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Fri Sep 3, 7:55 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Wed Sep 8, 5:56 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Fri Sep 3, 4:50 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Frank van Maarseveen, (Fri Sep 3, 4:55 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., , (Thu Sep 2, 7:02 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Sep 2, 6:03 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Sep 2, 6:04 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 1:46 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 3:50 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 3:45 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Mon Sep 6, 4:05 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 4:56 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando, (Mon Sep 6, 5:15 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, (Mon Sep 6, 8:55 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:17 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 2:46 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Bill Huey, (Thu Sep 2, 5:56 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 6:48 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Bill Huey, (Tue Sep 7, 5:44 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 4:22 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Stephen Rothwell, (Sun Sep 5, 3:27 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Sep 2, 1:50 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 2:03 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Charles P. Wright, (Thu Sep 2, 3:04 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 3:42 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Erez Zadok, (Thu Sep 2, 4:30 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Charles P. Wright, (Thu Sep 2, 4:05 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Jamie Lokier, (Thu Sep 2, 12:11 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Paul Jakma, (Thu Sep 2, 7:33 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 7:49 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 6:55 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 8:03 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Paul Jakma, (Thu Sep 2, 8:14 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 8:39 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Tonnerre, (Mon Sep 6, 11:07 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Mon Sep 6, 11:15 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Paul Jakma, (Fri Sep 3, 12:43 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Fri Sep 3, 7:45 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Dave Kleikamp, (Fri Sep 3, 9:05 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Fri Sep 3, 8:13 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Stephan von Krawczynski, (Sat Sep 4, 7:42 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Sat Sep 4, 2:27 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Fri Sep 3, 9:16 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 3, 5:45 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Spam, (Sat Sep 4, 7:07 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Sat Sep 4, 1:37 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Sat Sep 4, 2:21 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Dave Kleikamp, (Fri Sep 3, 9:33 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Dave Kleikamp, (Thu Sep 2, 1:41 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Pavel Machek, (Fri Sep 3, 11:48 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:25 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Sun Sep 5, 10:42 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Dave Kleikamp, (Fri Sep 3, 8:50 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Fri Sep 3, 8:25 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Jamie Lokier, (Wed Sep 1, 8:24 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Wed Sep 1, 11:35 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Sep 1, 11:38 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Thu Sep 2, 1:53 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 12:27 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 2:04 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Thu Sep 2, 3:15 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Robin Rosenberg, (Thu Sep 2, 3:55 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 3:36 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:11 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 3, 1:57 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, , (Thu Sep 2, 9:35 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, James Bruce, (Thu Sep 2, 8:50 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Sun Sep 5, 11:12 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 1:50 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Thu Sep 2, 5:04 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Thu Sep 2, 4:58 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Thu Sep 2, 11:32 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Timothy Miller, (Wed Sep 15, 1:23 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Thu Sep 16, 4:29 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Martin J. Bligh, (Thu Sep 2, 2:22 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:41 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 8:46 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:34 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 3, 1:59 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Steve Bergman, (Thu Sep 2, 3:52 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:35 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 3, 2:35 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 3, 1:26 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Chris Mason, (Fri Sep 3, 12:02 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 4:06 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Bernd Petrovitsch, (Fri Sep 3, 4:49 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Fri Sep 3, 5:53 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Martin J. Bligh, (Thu Sep 2, 4:16 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Christer Weinigel, (Thu Sep 2, 2:38 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Brian Beattie, (Fri Sep 3, 9:16 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Sep 2, 1:43 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, John Stoffel, (Thu Sep 2, 10:24 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 11:36 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 5:52 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Thu Sep 2, 11:40 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Fri Sep 3, 4:30 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Lee Revell, (Thu Sep 2, 2:21 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Oliver Neukum, (Thu Sep 2, 7:09 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 8:43 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Sep 3, 4:13 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Oliver Neukum, (Fri Sep 3, 4:30 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, , (Thu Sep 2, 9:18 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:39 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 8:47 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Thu Sep 2, 9:36 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 7:11 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, V13, (Thu Sep 2, 6:27 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, John Stoffel, (Thu Sep 2, 10:35 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Alan Cox, (Thu Sep 2, 5:32 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Oliver Hunt, (Thu Sep 2, 5:12 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Sun Sep 5, 9:28 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Thu Sep 2, 5:26 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Oliver Hunt, (Thu Sep 2, 5:45 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Fri Sep 3, 4:22 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 3, 1:41 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Mon Sep 6, 9:25 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Fri Sep 3, 3:30 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 3, 10:27 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Mon Sep 6, 9:43 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Alexander G. M. Smith, (Sat Sep 4, 9:20 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Chris Dukes, (Fri Sep 3, 5:07 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Fri Sep 3, 5:50 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Sun Sep 5, 9:44 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Wed Sep 8, 5:24 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Tonnerre, (Wed Sep 8, 12:02 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Thu Sep 9, 7:22 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Sun Sep 5, 10:13 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 6:02 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, , (Thu Sep 2, 6:39 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Helge Hafting, (Fri Sep 3, 4:28 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Spam, (Thu Sep 2, 7:06 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, Christian Mayrhuber, (Thu Sep 2, 10:38 am)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives (was..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Sep 1, 9:07 pm)

Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives, David Masover, (Wed Sep 1, 11:46 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Timothy Miller, (Thu Sep 9, 10:13 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 10, 1:22 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 10, 11:33 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Alexander G. M. Smith, (Fri Sep 10, 8:16 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 10, 12:32 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Peter Foldiak, (Fri Sep 10, 2:32 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 10, 2:57 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Timothy Miller, (Fri Sep 10, 11:47 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Fri Sep 10, 1:51 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 10, 2:15 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Timothy Miller, (Fri Sep 10, 8:00 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Wayne Scott, (Fri Sep 10, 11:50 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Horst von Brand, (Fri Sep 10, 1:50 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christophe Saout, (Thu Aug 26, 10:25 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 11:04 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Alex Zarochentsev, (Sun Aug 29, 8:34 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Wed Sep 1, 6:05 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Shaya Potter, (Sun Aug 29, 11:52 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Nikita Danilov, (Thu Aug 26, 11:41 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christophe Saout, (Thu Aug 26, 11:12 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 12:00 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Hans Reiser, (Thu Aug 26, 10:17 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Aug 26, 10:45 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Chris Wedgwood, (Thu Aug 26, 6:05 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Pavel Machek, (Fri Aug 27, 5:01 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 7:02 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Will Dyson, (Thu Aug 26, 11:50 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Lee Revell, (Thu Aug 26, 4:38 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Jamie Lokier, (Thu Aug 26, 5:00 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Christophe Saout, (Thu Aug 26, 4:50 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Lee Revell, (Thu Aug 26, 4:57 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Markus T, (Fri Aug 27, 5:21 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Spam, (Fri Aug 27, 7:34 am)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, Pavel Machek, (Fri Aug 27, 5:06 pm)

Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4, David