login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Saturday, July 27, 2002 - 11:02 pm

On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 11:31:49PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

Matthew, thanks for the patch. However, I'm not sure that the "blocking"
field can be removed without opening up some race conditions.

Please see the following analysis of the situation by Antony Edwards,
and make sure that removing the blocking field is still safe:

http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2002-January/002568.h=
tml

(I'd be more than happy to forward the original email to anyone who
dislikes web browsers as much as I do. Please mail me privately if you
would like me to send you a copy.)

--=20
http://sardonix.org/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus, Matthew Wilcox, (Sat Jul 27, 6:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus, Chris Wright, (Mon Jul 29, 7:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus, Greg KH, (Sun Jul 28, 2:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus, Seth Arnold, (Sat Jul 27, 11:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] LSM file locking patch is bogus, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Jul 27, 11:13 pm)
speck-geostationary