| From | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bo Brantén | trying to understand ext4 extents on disk format
Hello,
I am implementing support for ext4 extents in the Windows driver "Ext2Fsd"
originally written by Matt Wu (http://www.ext2fsd.com/) the driver
implements full read/write support for ext2/ext3 and is considered stable
by many users.
To understand the ext4 extents format on disk I have read a few papers by
Theodore Ts'o and studied a program called Ext2Read
(http://ext2read.blogspot.com/) but I am a bit unsure how to find all
extents when there are more than one block of them so ...
| Jul 29, 6:05 am 2010 |
| Akira Fujita | BUG? ext3: Allocate blocks over quota limit with mmap
Hi,
I found a problem that user can allocate blocks over quota limitation
on ext3 (and ext2) with mmap.
You can reproduce this with the following steps:
1. Enable user quota on ext3
[akira@bsd086 mnt]$ uname -r
2.6.35-rc6
[root@bsd086 mnt]# cat /proc/mounts | grep /dev/sda9
/dev/sda9 /mnt/mp1 ext3 rw,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=0,data=ordered,usrquota 0 0
[root@bsd086 mnt]# quotaon -p /mnt/mp1
group quota on /mnt/mp1 (/dev/sda9) is off
user quota on /mnt/mp1 (/dev/sda9) ...
| Jul 28, 7:08 pm 2010 |
| Chris Frost | Re: [PATCH] mke2fs.8.in: correct the sign of a block-siz ...
I think this is more readable; thanks!
--
Chris Frost
http://www.frostnet.net/chris/
--
| Jul 28, 9:11 pm 2010 |
| Eric Sandeen | [PATCH V2] mke2fs.8.in: clarify the sign of a block-size ...
This bit of the mke2fs manpage is slightly confusing:
-b block-size
Specify the size of blocks in bytes. <snip>
If block-size is negative, then mke2fs will use heuristics
to determine the appropriate block size, with the constraint
that the block size will be at least block-size bytes.
because it sounds like the block size will be at least a negative
number. Clarify just what the negative sign means.
Reported-by: Chris Frost <chris@frostnet.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric ...
| Jul 29, 9:59 am 2010 |
| bugzilla-daemon | [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_in ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEW
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
| Jul 29, 12:38 pm 2010 |
| bugzilla-daemon | [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_in ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the ...
| Jul 29, 12:38 pm 2010 |
| bugzilla-daemon | [Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_in ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312
--- Comment #19 from Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> 2010-07-29 19:29:50 ---
This one needs to be reopened. The WARNING that I get does not happen every
reboot, but now I'm getting 2 when it happens. This kernel includes the 3
patches posted above.
[ 12.183797] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 12.183808] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:964
__mark_inode_dirty+0x10f/0x1a0()
[ 12.183811] Hardware name: HP Pavilion ...
| Jul 29, 12:29 pm 2010 |
| previous day | today | next day |
|---|---|---|
| July 28, 2010 | July 29, 2010 | July 30, 2010 |
