linux-ext4 mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
bugzilla-daemon
[Bug 16312] WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_in ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |16055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. --
Jun 28, 10:48 am 2010
bugzilla-daemon
[Bug 16312] New: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __ma ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16312 Summary: WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1127 __mark_inode_dirty Product: File System Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.35-rc3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: ext3 AssignedTo: fs_ext3@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: maciej.rutecki@gmail.com ...
Jun 28, 10:47 am 2010
Toshiyuki Okajima
[PATCH][BUG] ext4: do not execute ext4_std_error with EF ...
From: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com> You know, do_truncate() can call ext4_setattr() (via notify_change()). And, ext4_setattr() can return with -EFBIG if the argument(length) of do_truncate() is more than sbi->s_bitmap_maxbytes. At that time, it also calls ext4_std_error() with -EFBIG. Besides, a panic happens when ext4_setattr() returns with -EFBIG after we mount an ext4 filesystem with errors=panic. The following steps can make this problem easily. (1) # /bin/dd ...
Jun 27, 7:42 pm 2010
Eric Sandeen
Re: [PATCH][BUG] ext4: do not execute ext4_std_error wit ...
Whoops, that one was my fault; thanks for catching it. I might just "return error" at that spot, but this works fine too. --
Jun 28, 7:58 am 2010
tytso
Re: lifetime_write_kbytes isn't preserved during unclean ...
Yes, right now we are only updating the superblock's lifetime write kbytes at unmount time. It should be possible to do a better job; but I don't want to increase writes to the disk just to keep the s_lifetime value up-to-date. So what we should probably do is update it when we are going to be updating the superblock anyway (i.e., when we update the orphaned inode linked list) and maybe on some periodic basis (say once an hour) otherwise. Thanks for reporting this. I'll put it on my ...
Jun 28, 12:57 pm 2010
Greg KH
Re: [stable] [PATCH v2.6.32.y 01/53] ext4: Fix potential ...
Nope. Care to resend them? thanks, greg k-h --
Jun 28, 8:48 am 2010
previous daytodaynext day
June 27, 2010June 28, 2010June 29, 2010