Home » Mailing list archives » linux-ext4 » 2010 » March

linux-ext4 mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
jing zhang
[PATCH] ext4: memory leakage in ext4_mb_init()
From: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com> Date: Sun Mar 21 21:59:35 2010 Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <zj.barak@gmail.com> --- --- linux-2.6.32/fs/ext4/mballoc.c 2009-12-03 11:51:22.000000000 +0800 +++ ext4_mm_leak/mballoc3.c 2010-03-21 21:37:18.000000000 +0800 @@ -2360,6 +2360,24 @@ err_freesgi: return -ENOMEM; } +static void ext4_mb_destroy_backend(struct ...
[ message continues ]
Mar 21, 7:01 am 2010
bugzilla-daemon
[Bug 15579] ext4 -o discard produces incorrect blocks of ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15579 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Beckmann <kernel-bugs@abeckmann.de> 2010-03-21 09:45:54 --- The patch didn't apply cleanly to 2.6.33, I had to "remove the old code block" manually. So far after rebuilding the ext4 module I haven't experienced the problem any more. Please get this into 2.6.33.x. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ...
[ message continues ]
Mar 21, 2:46 am 2010
bugzilla-daemon
[Bug 13549] Kernel oops while online resizing of an ext4 ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13549 --- Comment #5 from Alessandro Polverini <alex@nibbles.it> 2010-03-21 08:32:35 --- The -h option of e2image is not recognised on my tool, sorry, I tried e2image 1.41.10. The bzip2 compressed output of e2image of my partition is around 200Mb long, please everybody who is interested in it contact me so I can prepare a download link for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are ...
[ message continues ]
Mar 21, 1:33 am 2010
tytso
Re: [Bug 15576] New: Data Loss (flex_bg and ext4_mb_gene ...
This is an e2fsprogs bug. If you run e2fsck at this point, pass 5 errors will be reported, that exactly correspond with what you report the kernel ends up complaining about: Free blocks count wrong for group #12 (2, counted=0). Free blocks count wrong for group #13 (2, counted=0). Free blocks count wrong for group #14 (2, counted=0). Free blocks count wrong for group #15 (9913, counted=9911). That's because the the file system is getting remounted read-only when The basic idea ...
[ message continues ]
Mar 21, 4:43 pm 2010
previous daytodaynext day
March 20, 2010March 21, 2010March 22, 2010