On 02/09/2010 08:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted text
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Pretty simple to reproduce, boot, suspend, press shift
>>
>> Acer Aspire 1681, Celeron, 2.6.33-rc6. Trace and config attached.
> 
> This looks suspicious:
> 
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 03/42:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: firewire_core: rediscovered device fw0
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 03/45:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04)
> Feb  8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100

These aren't harmful in themselves.  It just means that the device
failed commands BIOS requested via ACPI.  Just in case, does
"libata.noacpi=1" make any difference to the oops?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html