linux-ext4 mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
bugzilla-daemon
[Bug 25792] New: Kernel panic in __mark_inode_dirty (fs- ...
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25792 Summary: Kernel panic in __mark_inode_dirty (fs-writeback.c: 978) Product: File System Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.36-rc8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P1 Component: ext4 AssignedTo: fs_ext4@kernel-bugs.osdl.org ReportedBy: ...
Dec 28, 5:10 pm 2010
Mike Christie
Re: Ext4 and scsi commands resubmission
The request goes to eh head. scsi layer calls blk_requeue_request->elv_requeue_request-> elv_insert(ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE) and ELEVATOR_INSERT_REQUEUE's case falls through to the ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT case. --
Dec 28, 9:43 pm 2010
Ted Ts'o
Re: Uneven load on my raid disks.
Actually, "tune2fs -l" and "dumpe2fs -h" both run in about the same amount of time. dumpe2fs without the -h option runs slower than tune2fs -l, true. But that's because it reads and prints out information regarding the block and inode allocation bitmaps. - Ted --
Dec 29, 3:17 pm 2010
Kay Diederichs
Re: Uneven load on my raid disks.
Rogier Wolff wrote: % tune2fs -l /dev/md0 ... RAID stride: 128 RAID stripe width: 768 ... runs much faster than dumpe2fs. The command can also adjust the values. HTH, Kay --
Dec 29, 9:40 am 2010
previous daytodaynext day
December 28, 2010December 29, 2010December 30, 2010