Home » Mailing list archives » linux-ext4 » 2009 » September » 3

Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD stripe width, writes in storage

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Krzysztof Halasa
Subject: Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD stripe width, writes in storage
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009 - 4:50 pm

Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com> writes:


Yes. However, you mentioned external RAID arrays disable disk caches.
That's why I asked if they are using SATA or SCSI/etc. disks, and if
they have battery-backed cache.


The cache is flushed with working barriers. I guess it should be
superior to disabled WB cache, in both performance and expected disk
lifetime.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is pos ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Mar 12, 2:21 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Jochen Voß, (Thu Mar 12, 4:40 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Rob Landley, (Thu Mar 12, 12:13 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 16, 5:28 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 16, 5:30 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Mar 16, 12:03 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Rob Landley, (Mon Mar 16, 12:26 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Sitsofe Wheeler, (Mon Mar 16, 12:40 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Greg Freemyer, (Mon Mar 16, 12:45 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Rob Landley, (Mon Mar 16, 2:43 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 16, 2:48 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Kyle Moffett, (Mon Mar 16, 9:55 pm)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Mar 21, 4:24 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 23, 3:45 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 23, 4:00 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Mar 23, 11:23 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Goswin von Brederlow, (Mon Mar 30, 8:06 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 2:26 am)
[patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operatio ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 2:31 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Florian Weimer, (Mon Aug 24, 4:19 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Aug 24, 6:01 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Greg Freemyer, (Mon Aug 24, 6:21 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Aug 24, 6:50 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Artem Bityutskiy, (Mon Aug 24, 7:55 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 11:39 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 11:44 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 11:48 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 12:52 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 24, 1:24 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 1:52 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 24, 2:08 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Mon Aug 24, 2:11 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Greg Freemyer, (Mon Aug 24, 2:11 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 2:25 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 2:33 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 24, 3:05 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Zan Lynx, (Mon Aug 24, 3:22 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Mon Aug 24, 3:30 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Aug 24, 3:39 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 3:41 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 3:44 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Aug 24, 4:00 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Mon Aug 24, 4:42 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Mon Aug 24, 5:02 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 24, 5:06 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Aug 24, 5:08 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 24, 5:34 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 2:32 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 2:34 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 2:42 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 6:37 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Alan Cox, (Tue Aug 25, 6:42 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Florian Weimer, (Tue Aug 25, 7:43 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Tue Aug 25, 8:34 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Tue Aug 25, 9:11 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Jan Kara, (Tue Aug 25, 11:45 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Tue Aug 25, 11:52 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Tue Aug 25, 1:56 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Tue Aug 25, 2:08 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 2:15 pm)
[patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 3:21 pm)
[patch] document that ext2 can't handle barriers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 3:27 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 3:33 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 3:40 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 3:42 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 3:51 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 3:59 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Tue Aug 25, 4:03 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 4:03 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 4:26 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 4:29 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 4:37 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 4:40 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Tue Aug 25, 4:46 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 4:48 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Tue Aug 25, 4:48 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 4:53 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 4:56 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:06 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:11 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:12 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:12 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:16 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 5:20 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:20 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 5:26 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:26 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:28 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:31 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:38 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:39 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 5:44 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:45 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 5:50 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Tue Aug 25, 6:00 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Tue Aug 25, 6:15 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Aug 25, 6:16 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 6:17 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Tue Aug 25, 6:19 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Henrique de Moraes H ..., (Tue Aug 25, 7:53 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Tue Aug 25, 7:55 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Tue Aug 25, 7:58 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 25, 8:32 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 25, 8:50 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 25, 9:20 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Rik van Riel, (Tue Aug 25, 9:24 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Wed Aug 26, 3:39 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 4:12 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 4:17 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 4:21 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 4:22 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 4:25 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Wed Aug 26, 4:28 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Wed Aug 26, 4:29 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Wed Aug 26, 4:58 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Wed Aug 26, 5:01 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Wed Aug 26, 5:23 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Wed Aug 26, 5:28 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Theodore Tso, (Wed Aug 26, 5:37 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Theodore Tso, (Wed Aug 26, 5:40 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Aug 26, 6:10 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ric Wheeler, (Wed Aug 26, 6:11 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Wed Aug 26, 6:37 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Wed Aug 26, 6:43 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, david, (Wed Aug 26, 6:44 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Rik van Riel, (Wed Aug 26, 7:45 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Wed Aug 26, 11:02 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 8:16 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 8:34 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 8:53 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 10:19 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 10:27 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Aug 26, 11:06 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Eric Sandeen, (Wed Aug 26, 11:28 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Wed Aug 26, 11:54 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Thu Aug 27, 12:34 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., David Woodhouse, (Thu Aug 27, 1:46 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Aug 27, 4:43 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Aug 27, 5:24 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Aug 27, 6:10 am)
MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document condi ..., Jeff Garzik, (Thu Aug 27, 9:54 am)
Re: MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document c ..., Alasdair G Kergon, (Thu Aug 27, 11:09 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Thu Aug 27, 1:51 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Aug 27, 3:00 pm)
raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/ ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Aug 27, 3:13 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Aug 27, 6:32 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Aug 27, 11:44 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret, Florian Weimer, (Fri Aug 28, 12:11 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret, NeilBrown, (Fri Aug 28, 12:23 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., NeilBrown, (Fri Aug 28, 12:31 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Fri Aug 28, 4:16 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Theodore Tso, (Fri Aug 28, 5:08 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Fri Aug 28, 7:37 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Fri Aug 28, 7:46 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Fri Aug 28, 7:49 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Robert Hancock, (Fri Aug 28, 6:33 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 2:38 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 2:39 am)
[testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 2:49 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 3:02 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 3:05 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 3:09 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Ric Wheeler, (Sat Aug 29, 4:28 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Ron Johnson, (Sat Aug 29, 4:47 am)
Re: ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is ..., Alan Cox, (Sat Aug 29, 6:04 am)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, jim owens, (Sat Aug 29, 9:12 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Sat Aug 29, 9:27 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., david, (Sat Aug 29, 9:35 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Rob Landley, (Sat Aug 29, 1:22 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 2:33 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 2:34 pm)
Re: [patch] document flash/RAID dangers, Pavel Machek, (Sat Aug 29, 11:49 pm)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 12:01 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 12:03 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 12:07 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 12:19 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 12:51 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Christian Kujau, (Sun Aug 30, 2:01 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., david, (Sun Aug 30, 5:48 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., david, (Sun Aug 30, 5:55 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Sun Aug 30, 7:12 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Michael Tokarev, (Sun Aug 30, 7:44 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Aug 30, 8:05 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Theodore Tso, (Sun Aug 30, 8:20 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Sun Aug 30, 9:10 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Aug 30, 9:35 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 31, 6:15 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 31, 6:16 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Mark Lord, (Mon Aug 31, 6:19 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 31, 6:21 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 31, 6:22 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., jim owens, (Mon Aug 31, 8:14 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., david, (Mon Aug 31, 8:50 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 31, 9:21 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Aug 31, 10:49 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Mon Aug 31, 11:01 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., martin f krafft, (Mon Aug 31, 11:07 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Aug 31, 11:31 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., david, (Mon Aug 31, 12:11 pm)
MD5/6? (was Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret ...), Ron Johnson, (Mon Aug 31, 2:01 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Jesse Brandeburg, (Mon Aug 31, 3:26 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ron Johnson, (Mon Aug 31, 4:19 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., martin f krafft, (Mon Aug 31, 10:45 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Sep 1, 6:58 am)
Re: MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document c ..., Pavel Machek, (Tue Sep 1, 7:01 am)
Re: MD/DM and barriers (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document c ..., Michael Tokarev, (Wed Sep 2, 9:17 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Sep 2, 1:12 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Ric Wheeler, (Wed Sep 2, 1:42 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Wed Sep 2, 1:55 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Sep 2, 3:45 pm)
[PATCH] Update Documentation/md.txt to mention journaling ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Sep 2, 3:49 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Sep 2, 4:00 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., david, (Wed Sep 2, 4:09 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., jim owens, (Wed Sep 2, 5:36 pm)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Wed Sep 2, 6:59 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Rob Landley, (Wed Sep 2, 7:41 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Sep 3, 1:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] Update Documentation/md.txt to mention journal ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Sep 3, 2:08 am)
Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable oper ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Sep 3, 2:47 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Sep 3, 4:12 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 4:18 am)
Re: [PATCH] Update Documentation/md.txt to mention journal ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 5:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Update Documentation/md.txt to mention journal ..., Pavel Machek, (Thu Sep 3, 5:31 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Sep 3, 6:34 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 6:50 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Sep 3, 6:59 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., jim owens, (Thu Sep 3, 7:14 am)
wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD str ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 7:15 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Florian Weimer, (Thu Sep 3, 7:26 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., david, (Thu Sep 3, 7:35 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 8:09 am)
what fsck can (and can't) do was Re: [patch] ext2/3: docum ..., david, (Thu Sep 3, 9:56 am)
Re: what fsck can (and can't) do was Re: [patch] ext2/3: d ..., Theodore Tso, (Thu Sep 3, 12:27 pm)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Sep 3, 4:50 pm)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Ric Wheeler, (Thu Sep 3, 5:39 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Rob Landley, (Fri Sep 4, 12:44 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Ric Wheeler, (Fri Sep 4, 4:49 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Mark Lord, (Fri Sep 4, 2:21 pm)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Ric Wheeler, (Fri Sep 4, 2:29 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Sep 5, 3:28 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Sep 5, 3:34 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Ric Wheeler, (Sat Sep 5, 5:20 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Mark Lord, (Sat Sep 5, 5:57 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Ric Wheeler, (Sat Sep 5, 6:40 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Jonathan Corbet, (Sat Sep 5, 6:54 am)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Pavel Machek, (Sat Sep 5, 2:27 pm)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or fu ..., NeilBrown, (Sat Sep 5, 2:43 pm)
Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ..., Theodore Tso, (Sat Sep 5, 2:56 pm)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Sep 7, 4:45 am)
Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Sep 7, 6:10 am)
periodic fsck was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Nov 9, 1:53 am)
Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] e ..., Pavel Machek, (Mon Nov 9, 3:50 am)
Re: periodic fsck was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditi ..., Theodore Tso, (Mon Nov 9, 7:05 am)
Re: periodic fsck was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditi ..., Andreas Dilger, (Mon Nov 9, 8:58 am)
Re: fsck more often when powerfail is detected (was Re: wi ..., tytso, (Sun Apr 4, 10:39 am)
Re: fsck more often when powerfail is detected (was Re: wi ..., tytso, (Sun Apr 4, 12:29 pm)
Re: fsck more often when powerfail is detected (was Re: wi ..., tytso, (Sun Apr 4, 12:35 pm)