I would strike the entire mention of MD devices since it is your assertion, not
a proven fact. You will cause more data loss from common events (single sector
errors, complete drive failure) by steering people away from more reliable
storage configurations because of a really rare edge case (power failure during
split write to two raid members while doing a RAID rebuild).
All users who care about data integrity - including those who do not use MD5 but
just regular single S-ATA disks - will get better reliability from a UPS.
This is very misleading. All storage "can" have silent data loss, you are making
a statement without specifics about frequency.
FSCK can repair the file system metadata, but will not detect any data loss or
corruption in the data blocks allocated to user files. To detect data loss
properly, you need to checksum (or digitally sign) all objects stored in a file
system and verify them on a regular basis.
Also helps to keep a separate list of those objects on another device so that
when the metadata does take a hit, you can enumerate your objects and verify
that you have not lost anything.
ric
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html