Re: on patch "DVB: add firesat driver" in staging.git

Previous thread: [PRJ007] tty over TCP driver needed by Greg KH on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 3:30 pm. (12 messages)

Next thread: PRJ001 status - I2C drivers by codemonkey on Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 6:03 am. (7 messages)
From: Greg KH
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 5:15 pm

A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?



Neither would I, and how would line settings work here?  I think the
protocol on the device is already fixed, as they have working drivers
for other operating systems, and would probably not want to change them

I don't know, that is in the specs for the device, I haven't looked at
them yet.

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008 - 3:24 pm

So it looks like the most economic course of action would be to do the 
conversion after mainline merge.  With a working and merged ieee1394 
subsystem based firesat driver, the circle of persons who can do a 
conversion to the firewire subsystem is bigger.  I for one might be able 
to spend some time on such activities from October onwards or so.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- -==- =----
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Previous thread: [PRJ007] tty over TCP driver needed by Greg KH on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 3:30 pm. (12 messages)

Next thread: PRJ001 status - I2C drivers by codemonkey on Thursday, October 18, 2007 - 6:03 am. (7 messages)