Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@...>
Date: Thursday, July 2, 2009 - 11:22 am

Chris Mason wrote:

What about the "administrative" part of using btrfs as a volume manager?

For example, I can partition (fdisk + kpartx), extend volumes in LVM 
easily, on the host.


Are there any tools to "partition" or "extend" file images?

qemu-nbd and nbd-client come to mind, but it's a bit of an overhead (in 
typing, I mean).


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Tomasz Chmielewski, (Wed Apr 22, 3:20 pm)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Chris Mason, (Thu Apr 23, 2:45 pm)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Tomasz Chmielewski, (Thu Apr 23, 7:34 pm)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Chris Mason, (Fri Apr 24, 8:38 am)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Tomasz Chmielewski, (Thu Jul 2, 11:22 am)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Chris Mason, (Mon Jul 6, 2:51 pm)
Re: LVM vs btrfs as a "volume manager" for SANs, Dmitri Nikulin, (Wed Apr 22, 8:13 pm)