Re: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless drivers

Previous thread: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless drivers by Philip A. Culver on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 12:36 pm. (3 messages)

Next thread: [ath5k-devel] QoS WMM support and ath5k by Fab on Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 7:51 am. (1 message)
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 2:23 pm

Great, thanks.

[ 3606.561930] ath0: switched to short barker preamble (BSSID=00:0f:24:c2:59:70)
[ 3629.398993] ath0: RX deauthentication from 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 (reason=2)
[ 3629.398996] ath0: deauthenticated

Hmm, reason = 2 means AP disconnected you because authorization was no longer 
valid.  That's not ringing bells for me.

5006s are known to still be a little iffy.  That's what I have so I'll try 
replicating your test case at home.  In the meantime can you verify you have
the patch below in the compat driver?  (Just make sure the "rxs.flag = 0;" 
part is in base.c.):

   http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/14684

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 8:45 am

The dmesg log I sent you was run on the 05-07-2008 compat-wireless which did
not have the below patch.  However, I originally ran into the issue on the
05-21-2008 archive which did have the patch.  I am going to put today's
compat-wireless drop on the machine and see what the behavior is and if the
deauthetication occurs with the same symptoms.  I have a AR5212 (Cisco PC
Card) that I will try to see if it acts differently as well.

Thanks,
Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Copeland [mailto:me@bobcopeland.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 5:24 PM
To: Philip A. Culver; ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: RE: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless

Great, thanks.

[ 3606.561930] ath0: switched to short barker preamble
(BSSID=00:0f:24:c2:59:70)
[ 3629.398993] ath0: RX deauthentication from 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 (reason=2)
[ 3629.398996] ath0: deauthenticated

Hmm, reason = 2 means AP disconnected you because authorization was no
longer 
valid.  That's not ringing bells for me.

5006s are known to still be a little iffy.  That's what I have so I'll try 
replicating your test case at home.  In the meantime can you verify you have
the patch below in the compat driver?  (Just make sure the "rxs.flag = 0;" 
part is in base.c.):

   http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/14684

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 2:36 pm

Hello,

I tried this on a AR5212 chipset card with slightly better results but still
the behavior was not good.  The scp copy would push between 8 and 60MB in
about 6 tries across the wireless connection before stalling.  The behavior
here seems a tad different as well.  I believe the driver reassociates with
the AP but it still kills the connection and file transfer.  On the remote
side of the file push, scp would respond "Received disconnect from
192.168.2.253: 2: Corrupted MAC on input." The dmesg trace is as follows:

[ 2518.780769] ath0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 - assume
out of range
[ 2523.436319] ath0: Initial auth_alg=0
[ 2523.436333] ath0: authenticate with AP 00:0f:24:c2:59:70
[ 2523.439651] ath0: RX authentication from 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 (alg=0
transaction=2 status=0)
[ 2523.439659] ath0: authenticated
[ 2523.439664] ath0: associate with AP 00:0f:24:c2:59:70
[ 2523.442022] ath0: RX ReassocResp from 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 (capab=0x431
status=0 aid=11)
[ 2523.442031] ath0: associated
[ 2523.442051] ath0: CTS protection enabled (BSSID=00:0f:24:c2:59:70)
[ 2523.442057] ath0: switched to short barker preamble
(BSSID=00:0f:24:c2:59:70)

I also saw one anomaly.  The dmesg filled up with the following over and
over again until I killed the scp process.

[ 2289.719217] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 2289.720613] recvmsg bug: copied D6E83810 seq D6E83DB8
[ 2289.721032] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 2289.722409] recvmsg bug: copied D6E83810 seq D6E83DB8
[ 2289.722729] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 2289.724123] recvmsg bug: copied D6E83810 seq D6E83DB8
[ 2289.724454] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 2289.725823] recvmsg bug: copied D6E83810 seq D6E83DB8
[ 2289.725990] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 2289.727381] recvmsg bug: copied D6E83810 seq D6E83DB8

I ...
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 2:12 pm

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Philip A. Culver

Well, I tried replicating this today.  I definitely get stalls when
pushing a lot of data, and a fair number of dropped packets.  However
with the latest code I do not get disconnects from the AP -- even
while a scp connection is stalled I can browse the net more or less
successfully.  I didn't see the 'Corrupted MAC' error but I'm not sure
I have ssh logging that to syslog.

It would be interesting to trace the packets to see whether the source

Strange, we have a packet in the receive queue whose sequence number
is higher than the current high-water mark?  I don't know the network
stack well enough to know why.  Maybe something is stomping on that
skb.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Nick Kossifidis
Date: Monday, May 26, 2008 - 10:15 am

Can you verify that rate changes when you force a different rate via iwconfig ?
(put a printk when using tx_info stuct)

I believe it's a problem that came up during the move of tx_control to
skb->cb (API change),
don't  have time to debug it right now unfortunately ;-(

Here is the change...
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=commit;h=fba...



-- 
GPG ID: 0xD21DB2DB
As you read this post global entropy rises. Have Fun ;-)
Nick
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 5:14 am

I'll give that a shot tonight, been trying to track down an input bug

D6E83DB8 - D6E83810 = 5A8..  0x5a is a funny number (POISON_INUSE),
but it's at a weird bit location, so could be coincidence.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 11:48 am

Hi,

I tried the scp copy again against the 05-29-2008 compat-wireless drivers.
I tracked the results for 5 of the attempts in a row.  Some background info:

AR5212 PCMCIA card
Modified Fedora 2.6.23.15-80 kernel (essentially added some SAS drivers from
intel)
Compat-wireless 05-29-2008
Connected via WPA-PSK, TKIP at about 40-50% signal strength.

Try 1 - Saw recvmsg bug in dmesg.  Scp was stalled and ctrl+c to kill it.
(dmesg_recvb
Try 2 - Saw no probe resp in dmesg.  Reassociated with access point.   Scp
was stalled and ctrl+c to kill
Try 3 - Saw no probe resp in dmesg.  Scp remoted received disconnect 2:
Corrupted MAC on input
Try 4 - Saw no probe resp in dmesg.  Scp reported closed by remote host.
Try 5 - Saw recvmsg bug in dmesg.  Scp stalled and ctrl+c to kill.

For tries 3-5 a ping was running to that machine as well.  831 packets
transmitted, 800 received, 3% packet loss.  Rtt min/avg/max/mdev =
2.366/11.292/604.221/42.193 ms

For try # 1 & 5.  The two numbers subtracted again  = 5A8.

Also on the system with the wireless card a custom protocol over TCP/IP
communicated with a server.  Whenever the stall occurred the protocol would
timeout and then reconnect.  In all cases a standard ssh terminal connection
to the system stayed connected.

Dmesg traces:

Try1:

151770] recvmsg bug: copied CF7782FF seq CF7788A7
[ 1560.151780] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 1560.151785] recvmsg bug: copied CF7782FF seq CF7788A7
[ 1560.151796] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 1560.151801] recvmsg bug: copied CF7782FF seq CF7788A7
[ 1560.151812] KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c
(1201)
[ 1560.151817] recvmsg bug: copied CF7782FF seq CF7788A7

This continues on for a 1MB log

Try 2-4 all had the same dmesg output:

[ 1713.643634] ath0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:0f:24:c2:59:70 - assume
out of range
[ 1718.565411] ath0: Initial auth_alg=0
[ 1718.565427] ath0: ...
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 5:32 am

Just to be clear, I should see changes to the rate in say,
ath5k_txbuf_setup?  When I do 'iwconfig rate X' while connected, the
rate changes according to iwconfig, but the printk-ed rate indeed

I still haven't seen this bug here.  Philip, which kernel are you
using?  Can you post your .config?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 8:09 am

Hi Bob,

I am using a modified Fedora 2.6.23.15-80 kernel.  It has added patches for
an Intel SAS drive chipset.  The .config file is attached.

-- Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: bcopeland@gmail.com [mailto:bcopeland@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Copeland
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 8:32 AM
To: Nick Kossifidis
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org; mcgrof@gmail.com;
pculver@bostonatlantic.net
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless
drivers


Just to be clear, I should see changes to the rate in say,
ath5k_txbuf_setup?  When I do 'iwconfig rate X' while connected, the
rate changes according to iwconfig, but the printk-ed rate indeed

I still haven't seen this bug here.  Philip, which kernel are you
using?  Can you post your .config?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
From: 'Bob Copeland'
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 4:56 am

Latest wireless-testing, particularly fixes this particular rate 
control issue.  Particularly:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=commit;h=463...


Ok I'll try to get this set up to see if there's something weird 
about 2.6.23 and compat-wireless

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com 

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 5:14 am

I 'particularly' shouldn't write emails before 8am :o

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Stefan Schweizer
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 7:36 am

Don't think so. I'm seeing the bug here with vanilla 2.6.25.4 +
compat-wireless-2008-06-04 and 2.6.26-rc4.

kernel: ath5k phy0: Atheros AR5213A chip found (MAC: 0x59, PHY: 0x43)
kernel: ath5k phy0: RF5112A multiband radio found (0x36)

pairwise_cipher=CCMP
group_cipher=TKIP
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK

Kernel log (2.6.25.4 + compat-wireless):
Jun  3 13:28:13 kernel: wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:0f:66:c7:85:48 - assume out of range
Jun  3 13:28:13 kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:0f:66:c7:85:48
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: RX authentication from 00:0f:66:c7:85:48 (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0)
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: authenticated
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: associate with AP 00:0f:66:c7:85:48
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: RX ReassocResp from 00:0f:66:c7:85:48 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=3)
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: wlan0: associated
Jun  3 13:28:18 kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
Jun  3 13:28:28 kernel: wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1354)
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1354)
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied E3C09CF2 seq E3C0A29A
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1354)
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied E3C09CF2 seq E3C0A29A
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1354)
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied E3C09CF2 seq E3C0A29A
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1354)
Jun  3 13:28:46 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied E3C09CF2 seq E3C0A29A

Kernel log (2.6.26-rc4):
Jun  4 16:30:40 kernel: <7><7>wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:0f:66:c7:85:48 - assume out of range
Jun  4 16:30:44 kernel: wlan0: ...
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 8:10 am

Good to know.  On the poison theory, do you also have
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y (or SLAB)?

Does wireless-testing work any better?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Stefan Schweizer
Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 - 8:56 am

Not really. With 2.6.25.4 and wireless-testing I also just got

Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel: wlan0: No ProbeResp from current AP 00:0f:66:c7:85:48 - assume out of range
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel: WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:141 local_bh_enable+0x55/0x70()
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel: Modules linked in: radeon drm nfs lockd sunrpc arc4 ecb ath5k mac80211 cfg80211 binfmt_misc rfcomm l2cap bluetooth ppdev lp sbs container sbshc acpi_cpufreq cpufreq_stats cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_conservative ipv6 af_packet fuse joydev irtty_sir sir_dev pcmcia firmware_class nsc_ircc irda crc_ccitt parport_pc parport rtc snd_intel8x0m snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss psmouse snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec pcspkr ac97_bus snd_pcm snd_timer snd serio_raw i2c_i801 soundcore snd_page_alloc battery ac yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pcmcia_core bay video output dock button thinkpad_acpi hwmon intel_agp agpgart nvram evdev shpchp pci_hotplug sha256_generic aes_i586 aes_generic cbc dm_crypt crypto_blkcipher dm_mirror dm_snapshot dm_mod raid10 raid456 async_xor async_memcpy async_tx xor raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod floppy ide_cd_mod cdrom e1000 ehci_hcd uhci_hcd usbcore thermal processor fan unix
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel: Pid: 5698, comm: ath5k_pci Not tainted 2.6.25.4 #1
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c011e044>] warn_on_slowpath+0x54/0x70
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c01179ab>] ? default_wake_function+0xb/0x10
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c012f2b6>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x16/0x40
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c01163be>] ? __wake_up_common+0x3e/0x70
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c012c1ba>] ? insert_work+0x4a/0x70
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c012c391>] ? queue_work+0x31/0x40
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<c012c3af>] ? schedule_work+0xf/0x20
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<f9cb3748>] ? add_todo+0x38/0x60 [mac80211]
Jun  4 17:45:52 abraxas kernel:  [<f9cb38ed>] ? __ieee80211_key_free+0x2d/0x40 ...
From: Bob Copeland
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 - 10:25 am

Well, I looked through the code and I didn't see anything obvious.  My
guess was that an skb was being freed while something still held onto
it.  Then the skb came back out of the slab allocator for a new packet
and process A overwrote part of the sequence number.  It's telling
that the sequence is right in the middle of skb->cb where mac80211
holds the tx info.  Still, I couldn't find any problems with the
current code.

At this point, all I can suggest is adding printks in the disassociate
path and at the assert line that is triggering, which would rule that
out (e.g. the address of the skb should be the same if the above is at
all on track).

Also this is probably unrelated but worth a shot:


Johannes Berg is working on that one, there's a patch here if it's not
already fixed:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121378343122178&w=2

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 1:07 pm

Hi,

I can't actually compile any compat-wireless snapshots past 05-21-2008.
Starting on the 22nd it fails with implicit declaration of function
'skb_get_queue_mapping'.  I don't see a definition of this function anywhere
in the linux headers or the compat-wireless headers.  Any ideas?

I will try the latest drivers once I can compile :)

Thanks,
Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: bcopeland@gmail.com [mailto:bcopeland@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bob
Copeland
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 5:13 PM
To: Philip A. Culver
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless
drivers

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Philip A. Culver

Well, I tried replicating this today.  I definitely get stalls when
pushing a lot of data, and a fair number of dropped packets.  However
with the latest code I do not get disconnects from the AP -- even
while a scp connection is stalled I can browse the net more or less
successfully.  I didn't see the 'Corrupted MAC' error but I'm not sure
I have ssh logging that to syslog.

It would be interesting to trace the packets to see whether the source

Strange, we have a packet in the receive queue whose sequence number
is higher than the current high-water mark?  I don't know the network
stack well enough to know why.  Maybe something is stomping on that
skb.

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 12:21 am

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Philip A. Culver

Give me a few minutes.

 Luis
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 5:17 am

OK try now.

  Luis
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 9:15 am

I see no difference in the 05-29-2008 snapshot vs the 05-28-2008 one from
linuxwireless.org.   I will check again tomorrow in case the changes missed
the snapshot generation time.  Is this a 2.6.23 and earlier issue?  My
research seems to indicate the missing declaration was added to 2.6.24 in
skbuff.h.  

Thanks,
--Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:17 AM
To: Philip A. Culver
Cc: Bob Copeland; ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless
drivers

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@gmail.com>

OK try now.

  Luis

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Luis R. Rodriguez
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 9:29 am

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Philip A. Culver

It should be:

wireless@xc:~/compat-wireless-2.6$ cat compat-release
3.0-16-ge67fc86
wireless@xc:~/compat-wireless-2.6$ cat git-describe
v2.6.26-rc3-8077-g71f33ec

  Luis
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
From: Philip A. Culver
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 10:36 am

Hi,

Sorry about that, a brain freeze on my part.  I see the changes.  I ran the
wrong diff.  Everything compiles fine.  Thanks for fixing the issues!

Thanks,
Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 12:29 PM
To: Philip A. Culver
Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless
drivers

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Philip A. Culver

It should be:

wireless@xc:~/compat-wireless-2.6$ cat compat-release
3.0-16-ge67fc86
wireless@xc:~/compat-wireless-2.6$ cat git-describe
v2.6.26-rc3-8077-g71f33ec

  Luis

_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
Previous thread: [ath5k-devel] Transfers stall with ath5k on compat-wireless drivers by Philip A. Culver on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 12:36 pm. (3 messages)

Next thread: [ath5k-devel] QoS WMM support and ath5k by Fab on Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 7:51 am. (1 message)