On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:30:18AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com> wrote:

quoted text
> >  What if there is a pci-e card in the future that needs _PCI bit ?
> 
> I don't follow, the member is for struct pci_dev so its either a pci
> or pci-express device. If you mean what if we later have some srev in
> the range that is not pci-e, well then we'd use srevs wouldn't we?
> 
> > I guess for now we can work on with srevs to be safe but it's good to
> >  know of that feature, thanx ;-)
> 
> The point is that if there is already a variable we can use to detect
> if a device is pci-e then we shouldn't introduce any other new ones.

ACK for Luis's point.

-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
_______________________________________________
ath5k-devel mailing list
ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org
https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel