On 7 Jul 93 06:33:19 GMT, floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) said:
quoted text
> Outrageous?  You flatter yourself.
>
> If that is a valid interpretation then you are violating copyright laws
> every time you commit a copyrighted bit of prose to memory.
>
> Not outrageous, just silly.

I suggest to you that your conclusion of my interpretation is much more
outrageous than my conclusion of my RMS's interpretation (does that
parse?).

I honestly believe that RMS's objections to RIPEM+GMP (as relayed by the
RIPEM people) could be used to object to a, for example, RIPEM for Linux
produce.  That reads, "could" as in "possibly", not "could" as in
"definately".