Steve McMahon (steve.mcmahon@lambada.oit.unc.edu) wrote:But there is *no* reason that there aren't people out there offering Linux support. All the sources are available, and anyone with enough experience could do it, and get paid for it. And they could potentially rewrite any part of Linux to do whatever you want it to do. If there aren't people out there doing it now, I'd guess that there will be soon, since Linux is getting so popular. -laurie
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Jesper Juhl | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Joe Perches | Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API |
| Ken Chen | [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit |
git: | |
| walt | [VOTE] git versus mercurial |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git + ssh + key authentication feature-request |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Christian Weisgerber | Re: libiconv problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Daniel Ouellet | Show your appreciation and get your 4.2 DVD |
| new_guy | Code signing in OpenBSD |
| David C. Niemi | Re: rsh: "rcmd: socket: Permission denied" |
| Peter MacDonald | demand paging: proposal |
| Peter Grehan | TCP SYN_RECV state: stuck forever in accept() ? |
| Dennis Robinson | Source for uptime, df, ps ? |
