In article <CAw70M.wK@brunel.ac.uk> Nik.Clayton@brunel.ac.uk (Nik Clayton) writes:
quoted text
>In article <1993Jul28.071054.24227@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> abulhak@nyx.cs.du.edu (Andrew_-_Bulhak) writes:
>>thayne@unislc.slc.unisys.com (Thayne Forbes) writes:
>>
>>>: As far as Linux, well, you can not really complain because it is free...
>>
>>>What I meant was it takes a degree in CS just to get the damn thing
>>>loaded.  It is an example to show the difference between a slick
>>>installation and a crappy one.
>>
>>If you don't like the lack of a slick installation procedure, what are
>>you doing with Linux? People who can't hack Unix should stick with 
>>OS/2 and DOS.
>
>And people wonder why they sold millions?
>
>Well, DOS did anyway...
>
So has OS/2, versions 2.0 & 2.1 anyway...

John