In article <1993Jul20.185023.1@vms1.bham.ac.uk> B.A.McCauley@bham.ac.uk writes:[edited] well then why the hell didn't SLS include the newest gcc?? I'm having the EXACT same problem on a 386/40 along with a whole bunch of other crap that seems to be configuration errors caused by the newest SLS stuff. (don't get me wrong I think SLS is great since it provides everything I need in one installation and really takes care of a lot of system admin stuff that I'm not real familar with.) could you tell us what we have to get for the new compiler and where we can get it. thanks, - Jeff Wiegley you might have to reply to jwiegley@pollux.usc.edu if the address up top bounces.
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Jesper Juhl | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Joe Perches | Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API |
| Ken Chen | [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit |
git: | |
| walt | [VOTE] git versus mercurial |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git + ssh + key authentication feature-request |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Christian Weisgerber | Re: libiconv problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Daniel Ouellet | Show your appreciation and get your 4.2 DVD |
| new_guy | Code signing in OpenBSD |
| David C. Niemi | Re: rsh: "rcmd: socket: Permission denied" |
| Peter MacDonald | demand paging: proposal |
| Peter Grehan | TCP SYN_RECV state: stuck forever in accept() ? |
| Dennis Robinson | Source for uptime, df, ps ? |
