In article <MUTS.93Jun26103054@muts.hacktic.nl>
muts@muts.hacktic.nl (Peter Mutsaers) writes:
 
quoted text
>
>On Fri, 25 Jun 1993 11:00:21 GMT, SSB1PZP@imcvms.med.navy.mil (PERUCCI, PHILIP A.) said:
>
>  PPA> Personnally I prefer xview's olwm which IS included in SLS.
>
>But it looks awful. And xview is not used anymore by Sun, and OpenLook
>will be phased out all together (in favour of a kind of Motif). So I
>don't think it is a good idea for SLS to stick to xview.
>
>Even if Linux users themselves will manage to continue with it, it is
>a pity that you then have to use an X11 programming model that noone
>else in the world uses. At least everything should be Xt based, or be
>a widespread and well maintained alternative (like tcl/tk).
>--
I suppose you think that they should use nothing instead. Or I guess everybody
including those of us who don't like it can go out and pay $300 for motif.
=========================================================================
| L    IIIII NN   N U   U X   X       Out to fix what Windog MS'd up!!! |
| L      I   N N  N U   U  X X                                          |
| L      I   N  N N U   U   X          Another Word From Kevin Zupan    |
| L    IIIII N   NN  UUU   X X          Kzupan@lstc2vm.stortek.com      |
| LLLLL                   X   X                                         |
=========================================================================