Re: X Window Managers

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Sunday, June 27, 1993 - 6:23 am

On Sat, 26 Jun 1993 17:25:25 GMT, badger@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Jonathan Badger) said:

  JB> I think you are forgetting what Xview is. Xview was created as a
  JB> SunView API for Open Look. As such it really is Open Look
  JB> independent. Sun is not dumping Xview, as far as I know -- I
  JB> imagine there will be simply a new version of Xview that gives a
  JB> COSEy look-and-feel.

I doubt it. The latest version of Open Look already offered two
possibilities by adding Olit (Open Look through Xt instead of xview)
and Sun will conform itself to the rest of the X11 world, i.e. use the
standard toolkit. I think xview will be there for backwards
compatability for a while, but the main thing will be Xt based. It is
a better programming model.

  JB> As a side note, what is so "awful" looking about Open Look? It's
  JB> ugly because it doesn't look like a clone of Microsoft Windows,
  JB> like Motif does?

No, cause then I should also find Athena awful. But these things are
personal of course. I don't like these round buttons, pushpins and
cascade menus.
-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Peter Mutsaers       |  Bunnik (Ut),     |      Quod licet bovi,
muts@muts.hacktic.nl |  the Netherlands  |      non licet Jovi
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: X Window Managers, Peter Mutsaers, (Sun Jun 27, 6:23 am)