login
Header Space

 
 

Re: GNU Public license and the future of Linux...

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Saturday, June 12, 1993 - 10:30 am

dale@mkseast.uucp (Dale Gass) writes:

Agreed.


Probably true, if you defined "toy" as "not a commercial success".
Linux is not toy even now, for the people who use it seriously.


Technical excellence has nothing to do with it.  Marketing or pure
luck is what decides.


It might be threatening, actually, since if Linux were to become the
heir of MS-DOS, it would make it much, much more difficult to develop
it further: a few dozen million users tend to dislike if they have to
upgrade their whole system every few weeks.


No.  I want to keep Linux free.


I don't have anything against people doing commercial versions of
Linux (as long as they stay within the bounds of the GPL, of course).
Trying to make it the primary goal of everyone concerned with Linux is
not that exiting, though.

I think that some of the people who wish to make Linux a commercial
success should start working on that.  The matter of copyrights
certainly has been discussed to death.  The copyrights are not the
problem.  The problem is being able to afford ads in all major PC
magazines, get favorable reviews in the same magazines, provide
guaranteed support, and create a rock-solid, easy-to-install product,
and the zillion exciting applications for it, roughly in that order.

--
Lars.Wirzenius@helsinki.fi  (finger wirzeniu@klaava.helsinki.fi)
   MS-DOS, you can't live with it, you can live without it.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: GNU Public license and the future of Linux..., Lars Wirzenius, (Sat Jun 12, 10:30 am)
speck-geostationary