On Wed, 9 Jun 1993 03:06:54 GMT, lam836@cs.cuhk.hk (Savio Lam) said: SL> I think we need much more than good defaults. Programs using Xaw don't SL> look very good, Xaw3d is slightly better but doesn't look as nics as SL> Windows, Motif is good but it's not free. Besides, we need a decent SL> Desktop manager. xdtm is good, but IMHO, not very easy to use. The SL> biggest problem is that most X programs don't come with icons, but SL> most Windows apps do, and they are nice color icons too... Xaw programs look simple, but clear. Same goes for icons. All these things that look so nice (or less, loke open look) make your work not more effiecient, on the contrary. Why would you need an icon with a colorful picture representing a spreadsheet, why not have a a number of boxes (like twm's iconmanager) with the name of the application in it ("spreadsheet"). Often the pictures are hardly recognizable, and they take up so much room on your screen, which is always too small. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Peter Mutsaers | Bunnik (Ut), | Quod licet bovi, muts@muts.hacktic.nl | the Netherlands | non licet Jovi
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Robert Collins | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [PATCH] Avoid running lstat(2) on the same cache entry. |
| Steve Shockley | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| chefren | Re: [Fwd: Open-Hardware] |
| ropers | Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| Sangtae Ha | Re: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
