In article <1tdsujINN4eu@news.u.washington.edu> tzs@stein2.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) writes:
quoted text
>cleaves@ctron.com (Stephan R. Cleaves) writes:
>>for Linux ( and other UNIX boxes. ) Sure substitues for text input and 
>>formatting exist, but many newcomers to Unix from the DOS and Mac worlds will
>>not tolerate anything less than a full-featured WYSIWYG wordprocessor. I am
>
>It's not just newcomers.  I know quite a few people who've been using Unix
>for over a decade who would insist on a WYSIWYG wordprocessor.

Perhaps someone can clear up some confusion for me...what is "doc" ?
I played with it for a few minutes and it *seemed* to be a basic
WYSIWYG wordprocessor based on Interviews and came with the SLS distribution.
So, what is "doc" ?

John