login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [Q] Linux/SLS "mail" is too smart for its own good

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 1993 - 6:19 am

In article <1993Mar28.004916.19259@jmd386.lonestar.org>, jdoss@jmd386.lonestar.org (Joe M. Doss) writes:
|> In article <1993Mar24.190859.16371@eecs.nwu.edu> hpa@nwu.edu (H. Peter Anvin) writes:
|> >I have a question about the "mail" program for Linux, specifically
|> >from the SLS release, which I believe is the same as in mailpak.  The
|> >problem is that it bypasses the mail transport agent (smail) when it
|> >gets an address it "recognizes" (local or UUCP-style, I believe).
|> >Unfortunately that is a Bad Thing[TM] at least on my system.  "elm"
|> >behaves properly but some users on this machine are used to the BSD
|> >Mail interface and don't want to switch.
|> >
|> >So: is there either a way to force "mail" to send ALL its mail to the
|> >mail transport agent, or is there a different version of mail
|> >somewhere that does that?  (If there is but is not for Linux I'll try
|> >to port it -- that's no problem)  

I had the same problem. My solution was to install the sendmail+ida package.
Now I have simple /bin/mail and /bin/rmail as transport agents, elm as a
frontend and sendmail as the "router". There were only few things to change
in the sources. I don't remeber exactly, but the most important thing was to
change the header format of elm. The "from" line must be the first one and
the "subject" line the last. 

Andy
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [Q] Linux/SLS "mail" is too smart for its own good, Andreas Busse, (Wed Apr 14, 6:19 am)
speck-geostationary