In article <1993Feb26.192934.16406@colorado.edu> drew@juliet.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) writes:
:          So, shoelace is more convienient.

        Yes! And no for flamers .. [actually saw only one, and
        he did not know what he's talking about].

        Having multiple client machines with 10MB(root)+10MB(swap)+20MB(usr)
        connected using ethernet .. and don't like any 'install' stuff
        if image is copied over to those systems.

        Just need to keep in mind the image does not have any holes
        i.e. using cat instead of gnu cp.

        Had to report shoelace ;-). Actually finding a proper
        a.out.h.

        Twice have corrupted my disks with lilo ;-( .. now using
        shoelace & Linux 0.99.5 on multiple >4 machines ;-).
        I really do not need extfs for terminal servers ...

        I start to use LILO when there's /boot. If someone
        ports bsd fs .. and i can use Mach bootloader, then
        going to use it. LILO has nice docs, but LILO is not for me.
        All the other bootloaders seems to need MS-DOS, and I'm
        not going to buy N licenses (everyone has license? ;-)....

:   Boycott USL/Novell for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit. | Drew Eckhardt

        arl