login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Stabilizing Linux

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Sunday, August 9, 1992 - 7:56 pm

In article <1992Aug9.192757.27571@athena.mit.edu> tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o) writes:

One quite big point that you forgot:  Getting a committee of people to
agree on anything in a reasonable timespan is damned near impossible.
The Linux Standards Committee is the best example of this - not a
single *final* draft has been issued forth, and even the rough drafts
have huge problems with them that nobody seems willing to discuss.

If a committee is formed, decisions will still be ultimately made by
individuals.


Better yet, why are people demanding it without doing anything about
it?  I still have not seen a good 'adduser' utility for Linux - a
crude one (meaning no fancy curses interface) shouldn't take more than
a couple of evening programming sessions to write.  A user-friendly
one (read: fancy curses interface) shouldn't be that much harder.

As it is, the only adduser tool I've seen is one that claims to
have been written during the commericals of a TV show, and it looks
like it.  Hell, even the passwd/chsh programs out there aren't the
greatest.

A fancy sysadmin tool that did everything but make coffee would be
great, but we don't even have decent simple admin tools.


I couldn't have said it better myself, and I'm surprised it's taken
this long for someone to say it.

-- 
                                    +    Jim Winstead Jr. (CSci '95)
                                    |            Harvey Mudd College
                                    | jwinstea@jarthur.Claremont.EDU
                                    + This is all my words.  Honest!
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Stabilizing Linux, Jim Winstead Jr., (Sun Aug 9, 7:56 pm)
speck-geostationary