login
Login / Register
Header Space

 
 

Home » Mailing list archives » linux-activists » 1992 » August » 29

Executable sizes

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Kevin W. Hammond <hammond@...>
Subject: Executable sizes
Date: Saturday, August 29, 1992 - 6:20 pm

Is it normal for executables compiled under 0.97 to be on the average about
10K larger than those compiled under 0.96?  I was under the impression that
the shared libraries would reduce not only memory consumption, but the size
on disk as well?  Or is there so much new stuff in the 2.2.2d libraries that
the actual executable is larger??

-kwh-
-- 
Kevin W. Hammond
hammond@kwhpc.caseng.com

  CASE Engineering * 575 W. Madison #1601 * Chicago, IL 60661 * (312)902-2161
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Executable sizes, Kevin W. Hammond, (Sat Aug 29, 6:20 pm)

Mail archive search
Enter your search terms.
Optionally limit your search to a specific mailing list.
advanced
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently 5 users and 725 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate
Syndicate content
© 2007 KernelTrap.  |  Powered by Drupal.  |  Legal statement.
speck-geostationary