In article <ROLAND.92Aug24194541@churchy.gnu.ai.mit.edu> linux-ss@gnu.ai.mit.edu writes:
quoted text
>The GNU Project would like to find a volunteer to work on a
>single-server for the Mach 3.0 microkernel based on Linux.
>
>We want to use Mach, so straight Linux isn't what we are looking for.
>But Linux as a Unix emulator, running on top of Mach, could be just
>the thing to let us work on Mach development with nothing but free
>software.  We could also use it to release a complete free Mach-based
>system soon.

What advantage does Mach have over straight Linux? 
Is it worth loosing the simplicity and smallness of the Linux
kernel for it? The Mach systems I've seen have bigger kernel's than
Linux, and thats not counting the servers.
-- 
quoted text
>>Unix/C Contract worker available 5 years C/unix work experience<<  ______
Available for Telecommuting/Travel and contracts on the T Line       \    /
in the Boston MA area. Send me e-mail for a copy of my Resume.        \  /
       -- VWIS 508-793-9568 (2400 baud), Linux support BBS.--          \/