login
Header Space

 
 

Re: help selecting SCSI hardware.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Date: Sunday, August 23, 1992 - 4:29 pm

In article <1992Aug23.172424.10606@m.cs.uiuc.edu> najem@milton.cs.uiuc.edu (Zeyad Najem) writes:

BAD choice.  Currently, the Always controllers are NOT supported, 
and according to the always owners who have looked at writing 
an appropriate low level driver, Always is not real good about 
providing information, so it is unlikely that one will ever 
be written.


No, it doesn't work now, and it will probably never work under Linux.



No, SCSI tapes are essentially all the same, just like SCSI disks. 


Yes.

You should also know that right now there is a performance problem in 
the stock SCSI drivers, where we're reading/writing one block per revolution
on unbuffered drives, and aren't explicitly turning on the buffer in the 
code page on buffered drives.  The net effect is a transfer rate of 
one block per revolution, which means about 60K/sec on most drives. 

People have gotten up to ~300K/sec on buffered drives where the buffer 
is working.

This problem will be solved when the SCSI rewrite is finished.     

The code is about a week of work away from testing at most, the same state it's 
been in since spring - I do less "real" work during the school year, but 
also have classes getting in the way - so ya pays your money and ya takes your 
chances.  

-- 
Microsoft is responsible for propogating the evils it calls DOS and Windows, 
IBM for AIX (appropriately called Aches by those having to administer it), but 
marketing's sins don't come close to those of legal departments.
Boycott AT&T for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: help selecting SCSI hardware. , Drew Eckhardt, (Sun Aug 23, 4:29 pm)
speck-geostationary